Re: [Exim] Should vacation messages go to reply_address or return

Autor: Philip Hazel
Fecha:
A: Vadim Vygonets
Cc: exim-users
Asunto: Re: [Exim] Should vacation messages go to reply_address or return_path?

On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Vadim Vygonets wrote:

> In short, Reply-To: is for personal replies.

This issue has been thrashed to death, probably several times, on the
DRUMS mailing list. It is a rathole for which no consensus has been
reached. Please don't fill up the Exim list with yet another re-run of
this debate.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.

Este mensaje es parte del siguiente hilo:
	El árbol completo de hilos, ordenados por fecha
	Vadim Vygonets, mensaje del
	Philip Hazel, mensaje del

Re: [Exim] Should vacation messages go to reply_address or r…