Re: [Exim] Use of $reply_to address in vacation mechanism

> 'features' that are almost never used for real. Whoever actually wants
> to send out addresses like this example in the RFC?
>

>         Wilt . (the  Stilt) Chamberlain@???                   

I tried that a couple years ago, hoping that answers would also be sent
to that address and thus be easier to sort with procmail. Interestingly,
some MUAs removed the comment and I had complaints of the kind "please
stop using that address; it's legal, but it causes my _MTA_ to dump
core". :)

Michael