Are you taking into account the pop/imap client daemons aswell, or just
exim delivering to mail spools on NFS shares ?
I guess no one's going to be surprised when I say I find uw-imapd to be
a resource hog, cyrus-imap seems to be a better solution for sealed mail
servers, Im started exploring delivery to Maildirs and using
courier-imap
for mailservers where webmail clients or even shell mail clients need to
have access to mail, and while certainly a lot lighter than uw imapd,
it still takes a serious chunk of RAM, CPU and IO.. more so than exim
itself.
Case
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 11:36:52PM +0300, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel on Tue, Jul 25, 2000:
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Vadim Vygonets spoke the following immortal words,
> > > Nor is the machine money bound.
> >
> > Sorry but I can't understand the above statement.
>
> Oh, it's supposed to be meaningless. This discussion is way
> off-topic anyway. I agree that Athlon[0] may be better, but it's
> not what the original poster asked for.
>
> Vadik.
>
> [0] I have AMD's mouse pad advertising Athlon with the slogan
> "The fitire. Get there first.". Somebody asked me whether
> it's an advertisement for time travel.
>
> --
> Taunt not the sysadmin, for he can become you and make your life
> interesting.
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
