> If that isn't the problem, try posting the full output of
> exim -d 9 -bh 1.2.3.4
> to us here, and someone should be able to help..
I expected the session to croak at the beginning, but there's no check of
the host_accept_relay option, as far as I can tell.
Here are the gory details...
configure file:
host_accept_relay = 123.456.789.0
output of session:
$ ./exim -d9 -bh 123.456.789.1
Exim version 3.13 debug level 9 uid=0 gid=1
Berkeley DB: Sleepycat Software: DB 2.3.16: (1/19/98)
Caller is an admin user
Caller is a trusted user
sender address = root@???
sender_fullhost = [123.456.789.1]
sender_rcvhost = [123.456.789.1]
**** SMTP testing session as if from host 123.456.789.1
**** Not for real!
host in host_lookup? no (option unset)
host in host_reject? no (option unset)
host in host_reject_recipients? no (option unset)
host in auth_hosts? no (option unset)
host in sender_unqualified_hosts? no (option unset)
host in receiver_unqualified_hosts? no (option unset)
host in helo_verify? no (option unset)
host in helo_accept_junk_hosts? no (option unset)
220 blah.mydomain.com ESMTP MailWizard 1.01.2 Thu, 06 Jul 2000
16:32:19 -0700
220 blah.mydomain.com ESMTP MailWizard 1.01.2 Thu, 06 Jul 2000
16:32:19 -0700
smtp_setup_msg entered
HELO junk
SMTP<< HELO junk
junk in local_domains? no (end of list)
sender_fullhost = (junk) [123.456.789.1]
sender_rcvhost = [123.456.789.1] (helo=junk)
set_process_info: 6477 3.13 handling incoming connection from (junk)
[123.456.789.1]
250 blah.mydomain.com Hello junk [123.456.789.1]
250 blah.mydomain.com Hello junk [123.456.789.1]
MAIL FROM:junk@???
SMTP<< MAIL FROM:junk@???
junk@??? in sender_reject? no (option unset)
junk@??? in sender_reject_recipients? no (option unset)
250 <junk@???> is syntactically correct
250 <junk@???> is syntactically correct
RCPT TO:who@???
SMTP<< RCPT TO:who@???
aol.com in local_domains? no (end of list)
aol.com in relay_domains? yes (matched *)
250 <who@???> is syntactically correct
250 <who@???> is syntactically correct
DATA
SMTP<< DATA
354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
search_tidyup called
THIS is only a test...
host in ignore_fromline_hosts? no (option unset)
>>Original headers (size=22):
THIS is only a test...
search_tidyup called
>>Final headers:
P Received: from [123.456.789.1] (helo=junk)
by blah.mydomain.com with smtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
id 13AL8I-0001gT-00
for who@???; Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:32:47 -0700
I Message-Id: <E13AL8I-0001gT-00@???>
F From: junk@???
B Bcc:
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:32:47 -0700
THIS is only a test...
.
LOG: 0 MAIN
<= junk@??? H=(junk) [123.456.789.1] P=smtp S=188
250 OK id=13AL8I-0001gT-00
250 OK id=13AL8I-0001gT-00
**** SMTP testing: that is not a real message id!
smtp_setup_msg entered
QUIT
SMTP<< QUIT
221 blah.mydomain.com closing connection
221 blah.mydomain.com closing connection
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave C. [
mailto:djc@microwave.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 4:10 PM
To: Nancy Pettigrew
Cc: exim-users@???
Subject: Re: [Exim] using the -bh option to test exim
What RCPT TO: are you using? If its an address in a local domain, then
the relay checks wont matter - since sending to a local address is not
'relaying''..
Try:
MAIL FROM: junk@???
RCPT TO: junk@???
(Assuming of course that you don't handle mail for AOL locally :P)
If that isn't the problem, try posting the full output of
exim -d 9 -bh 1.2.3.4
to us here, and someone should be able to help..
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Nancy Pettigrew wrote:
> In order to test my configuration file, I've been using the -bh option for
> exim, followed by a bogus IP address.
>
> I never see the host_accept_relay option checked in the resulting session
> output.
> I am using an IP address that is not contained in the db file of "good" IP
> addresses (Created from pop authentications), but it does not get
rejected.
>
> I've also tried setting the host_accept_relay value to one IP address
> (host_accept_relay = 123.345.1.999), and then running exim with the -bh
> option and a different IP (/usr/etc/exim -bh 222.333.444.555), but the
> session does not get rejected.
>
> Am I missing something here?
>
> Danke.
>
>
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
details at
http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
--
