Re: [Exim] Why is Exim Freezing on 553 errors!!??

Kezdőlap
Üzenet törlése
Válasz az üzenetre
Szerző: Allan Rafuse
Dátum:  
Címzett: Dave C., Nigel Metheringham
CC: exim-users@exim.org
Tárgy: Re: [Exim] Why is Exim Freezing on 553 errors!!??
ignore_errmsg_errors looks to be what I want, but after checking
with the docs, ignore_errmsg_errors_after is the one I think I'll
set. Maybe for say 30min. It kind of acts like the auto_unthaw,
but if the message fails on the next delivery attempt, to the
bit bucket it goes.

As for my spam filter, the seen finish does the perfect job.

Thanks guys,
-Allan


On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:05:23 -0400 (EDT), Dave C. wrote:

>
>On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>
>>
>> allan@??? said:
>> > In the case of spam, like the one below, the bounce back message goes
>> > to a unknown user and that is why I don't want to send an email back
>> > to them. I'd like that to work or...
>>
>> I think you are expecting that fail to be able to produce an SMTP time
>> error code - which is the ideal way to do things. Unfortunately
>> filters of any sort do not kick in until the delivery attempt - after
>> the incoming SMTP transaction has completed.
>>
>> fail will cause a bounce message, to the original envelope sender
>>
>> > when it does send an email to the unknown user, this shows up in my
>> > log and the message is frozen!! WHY??
>>
>> You have an undeliverable error reply - the docs say this is always
>> frozen for the admin to deal with.
>
>Unless of course you set ignore_errmsg_errors, which I always do. I
>can't think of any case where I really care if an undeliverable
>message notification can't be delivered.
>
>For mail sent from outside our network, if the sender address is not
>deliverable, it usually spam.. If not, then its some idiot with a
>misconfiguration. Bouncing spam on the floo is a good thing, and its
>not my problem if some moron on NT can't setup their stuff right..
>
>For mail sent from within our network, almost all of the sender
>addresses are validated at SMTP time (sender_verify, and the outgoing
>server can do full verification on local parts in all local domains).
>So I dont have too many undeliverable outgoing messages that cant be
>returned to sender.
>
>>
>> You would do better to bit bucket the message - ie seen finish
>>
>>     Nigel.

>>
>>
>
>--
>
>
>
>--
>## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>



<- Allan Rafuse ->
Systems Administrator
Freeview Publishing Inc.
email: allan@???
web: http://www.freeview.com