Re: [Exim] No transport set by director

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Lumpp, Wolfgang
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] No transport set by director
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Lumpp, Wolfgang wrote:

> 2000-06-27 09:00:46 >"Lumpp, Wolfgang" <wol@???> <message filter>:
> transporting deferred: No transport set by director


It means "no transport set for system filter". This message has been
improved in release 3.15.

> In the log I get: original receipients ignored (message filter).
> Thats what I expect


But you must also have specified "save", "pipe", or "reply" somewhere in
the filter, which is why it needs a transport. Set
message_filter_file_transport (or equivalent for pipe/reply).

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.