On Tue, 23 May 2000, Dave C. wrote:
> In fact, all the check_* options are good candidates to be host-lists
> to apply the check to instead of booleans.
This is a plausible idea, which I will put on the Wish List, but it
seems to me to be a little bit strange. You are prepared to pass through
broken messages if they come from some hosts, but not if they come from
others? What is the point in making this distinction? If you are going
to pass on broken messages at all, why bother?
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
