Geez, I responded to wrong message... Sorry for wasting bandwidth (twice!)
:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin P. Fleming [
mailto:kfleming@access-laserpress.com]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 9:14 AM
Cc: exim-users@???
Subject: RE: [Exim] smtp_accept_max_per_connection?
These links all result in "page not found" from freshmeat...
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Hazel [
mailto:ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 1:18 AM
To: Pete Naylor
Cc: exim-users@???
Subject: Re: [Exim] smtp_accept_max_per_connection?
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Pete Naylor wrote:
> Of course - and I'm awaiting the book with much excitement :)
Don't get too excited; it may lead to disappointment. :-)
> I just
> wanted to supply the diff to you so that you might consider it next time
> you're preparing a release - it'll save us from having to maintain
> internal patches.
It's on the Wish List. It won't be in the very next release, because
that is likely to be bug fixes and tidies, but I will look at it when I
next do unconstrained development.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
--
## List details at
http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
details at
http://www.exim.org/ ##
--
## List details at
http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
details at
http://www.exim.org/ ##
