On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> > > > Return-path: <ph10@???>
> > > > Envelope-to: kai.henningsen-carmen@???
> > >
> > > (Incidentally, why does one use <> and not the other?)
> >
> > Because the first can be <>
>
> Ok, so why then does the second not use the same syntax?
Because I screwed up.
(Can't remember, but maybe the second was implemented before the first.
It's so long ago, it doesn't even seem to be in the earliest ChangeLog.)
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
