On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Bernhard Erdmann wrote:
> Doesn't help it, Sender: still remains to be just "be" instead of
> "be@???". Reply-To: should be reserved for special purposes, not
> as an all day solution.
Please run a test with debugging on, and let me look at the results.
(Oh, and also send me the rewriting rules.) If your input is coming via
SMTP, the test has to be something like this:
exim -d9 -bh 192.168.3.4
EHLO some.host.name
MAIL FROM:<sender@address>
RCPT TO:<recipient@address>
DATA
Sender: be
.
That *should* output debugging information about header rewriting.
I have just done this test. I arranged that the sending IP address was
in sender_unqualified_hosts. Exim added my qualify_domain to the Sender:
header.
So there is something that is different between our two systems.
However, if the sending hosts isn't in sender_unqualified_hosts, then it
won't qualify or rewrite. Is that the difference?
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
