On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Philip Hazel wrote:
> > > The problem with that is that I'll defer things that should bounce as
> > > unknown user.
>
> But if it's only for a while, does that matter? My smartuser solution
> has the same problem.
As I just pointed out not having read all my mail before answering.
Fine. It's not a really a problem defering things which come after
the localuser director. It's not what I wanted, but its not really
a problem anyway.
Defering some unknown users should be ok. Maybe I'll play with
verify_only and no_verify so that I still reject at SMTP those things that
should be rejected as unknown user.
-j
--
Jeffrey Goldberg +44 (0)1234 750 111 x 2826
Cranfield Computer Centre FAX 751 814
J.Goldberg@??? http://WWW.Cranfield.ac.uk/public/cc/cc047/
Relativism is the triumph of authority over truth, convention over justice.
