On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Ray Miller wrote:
> I think it would, because waiting for the lock is more aggressive than
> sleeping. Also, I cheated and patched exim before repeating the test
> described above. This time, exim did not report any errors obtaining a
> lock.
Well, the proof of the pudding and all that...
> Here's the patch (quick and dirty - not for production use):
Doesn't look too bad to me. I've made a note to investigate this one.
Thanks for doing the testing.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.