Re: [Exim] behaviour of exim -bv with and without -d

Startseite
Nachricht löschen
Nachricht beantworten
Autor: Philip Hazel
Datum:  
To: Steve Haslam
CC: exim-users
Betreff: Re: [Exim] behaviour of exim -bv with and without -d
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Steve Haslam wrote:

> Is this sane?
>
> bash# exim -d 1 -f 'spammer@???' -bv london
> Exim version 3.11 debug level 1 uid=0 gid=0
> probably Berkeley DB version 1.8x (native mode)
> london@??? failed to verify:
> mailman_restricterrors director forced verify failure
>
> bash# exim -f 'spammer@???' -bv london
> london@??? verified
>
> surely the second command should be saying "failed to verify"?
> (mailman_restricterrors is a directory with "fail_verify" set).


Yes, it should. I tried this example with a trivial director, and of
course it worked fine for me. So there is something subtle going on
involving your configuration. I guess you'll have to send me a copy of
your configuration so I can look at that.

Notice that in the first case the address ends up as london@???
and in the second as london@???. That indicates
something odd is happening.



-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.