On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:58:19 +0000, you wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 01:37:50AM +0000, Steven Clarke wrote:
>> As a side affect of the survey, we collected version information for the
>> MTAs. Here's a summary of the Exim versions currently in the wild. 2.xx
>> seems to be still outweigh 3.xx. It's difficult to know why.
>> Exim
>> Version Servers
>> 2.12 90
>> 3.03 37
>> 3.02 23
>> 2.05 23
>> 2.10 14
>> 3.12 11
>> 2.02 11
>> 1.92 11
>> 3.11 7
>> 2.11 5
>> 1.90 5
>> 1.82 5
>> 3.xx 4
>> 2.xx 4
>> 1.xx 1 (oldest was 1.73)
>
>Speaking for imaginet, I can say the reason we still run 2.x is
>because it's the release shipped with debian-stable.
Having this information and knowing that Debian's exims generate
speciral Received:-Headers (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)), it would be a good
idea to re-generate that list and add the information how many percent
of 2.x exims are Debian versions.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
