Re: [Exim] *Official* exim rpm

On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 10:01:42PM +1030, Andrew duxorth wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Friday, 3 December 1999 8:07
> Subject: RE: [Exim] *Official* exim rpm
> >> I agree that procmail is superfluous when using Exim, but I
> >> designed my
> >> RPM with RedHat systems in mind, where procmail is the
> >> default mda. It is
> >> there to make sure that old procmail setups don't break when
> >> upgrading to
> >> Exim.
> >2 rpms, exim-procmail and exim-no-procmail?
> sendmail and exim are a damn good combo. maybe you could include
> that too :) (I hope you dont faint Mark ;) )
> cya
> Andrew

exim and procmail are a reasonable combination... or are you saying
the exim filter language can do everything procmail can? (it didn't
look like it last time I looked...)