> I am working on another solution for our problem, that is using
> Vadims suggstion of rewriting using Fh, because this has some
> advantages, e.g. only headers which exists are rewritten.
> but as I tried this I ran in trouble with local messages, because
> some of the headers point to the world usable address
> (e.g. reply-to)
> but it should be possible to do a add/remove header for local
> messages as I suggested for the remote_smtp transport.
> this is indeed nearly the same but there maybe a few more
> advantages, since the messages going to the world are a bit more
> correct and imho local mail is not that critical.
now i am on my way to get this to work and got the following
problem:
I only want to fix a few headers in messages that are locally
delivered and use a smartuser director as the first of all
directors
rewritelocal:
driver = smartuser
# check if we can do anything for this local recipient
condition = "${lookup{${lc:$local_part}} \
lsearch{/usr/local/exim/aliases_inex} {$value} {}}"
# set the new address to the old address since exim needs it
new_address = $local_part@$domain
# no further rewriting
rewrite = false
headers_remove = "From:To:Reply-to"
headers_add = "From: ${lookup{\
${lc:${local_part:$h_From:}@${domain:$h_From:}}} \
lsearch{/usr/local/exim/aliases_exin} \
{$value} {$h_From:}}\n\
To: ${lookup{\
${lc:${local_part:$h_To:}@${domain:$h_To:}}} \
lsearch{/usr/local/exim/aliases_exin} \
{$value} {$h_To:}}\n\
${if def:h_Reply-to: \
{Reply-to: ${lookup{\
${lc:${local_part:$h_Reply-to:}@${domain:$h_Reply-to:}}} \
lsearch{/usr/local/exim/aliases_exin} \
{$value} {$h_Reply-to:}}\n}}"
userforward:
driver = forwardfile
file = .forward
no_verify
no_expn
check_ancestor
file_transport = address_file
pipe_transport = address_pipe
reply_transport = address_reply
etc.
this seems to work but if there is a .forward file
the message is correctly forwarded but there are two To: and
From: headers in it.
it looks like:
From: blah@???
To: foo@???
From: blah@???
To: foo@???
what is the reason for this behaviour ?
any ideas ?
hans
