On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 02:38:54PM +0100,
Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@???> is thought to have said:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> >
> > > I find the standard NDR
>
> > Oh rats! English is notoriously ambiguous - I guess that's why lawyers
> > make a lot of money. It's much easier to be rigorous in mathematical
> > notation. How about
>
> > [...]
> > or
> >
> > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients.
> > The following address(es) failed:
>
>
> I think that is the best among to three, and is what I was thinking of
> for local configuration.
I'd also agree with this for default wording.
> I have not, however, actually seen a case where someone was misled by
> the standard wording, but it seems very possible to me.
Heh. Well assuming they actually read the message they're usually fine.
Tabor
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tabor J. Wells twells@???
Fsck It! Just another victim of the ambient morality
