Well I did wonder if that was the case, as I noted the mention of the
negation feature, but I thought that was just an alternative syntax,
rather than a replacement. A glance through the ChangeLog didn't yield
that information, but I was looking for specific mentions of
"except_senders" rather than a more generic comment! I'll read more
carefully next time.
Thanks for the explanation Phil!
I agree that it's clearer this way, it was starting to get a bit baffling
with all the accepts and rejects and exceptions thereto going around!
Jethro.
> Apologies. There are typos in the manual. The except_senders option was
> abolished in the options re-organization that took place at the 3.00
> release. Any references to
>
> except_senders = xxxx
>
> should be replaced by
>
> senders = ! xxxx
>
> A "negation" feature was introduced at release 3.00, and all the
> complicated accept/reject and xxx/except_xxx combinations were
> condensed to a single option in each case. The new approach seems to be
> much understandable.
