Re: [Exim] mail server for large sites

Kezdőlap
Üzenet törlése
Válasz az üzenetre
Szerző: me
Dátum:  
Címzett: Nigel Metheringham
CC: exim-users
Tárgy: Re: [Exim] mail server for large sites
Thanks for that, but I am actually with the same
ISP, and always have been. As for the system
design, well if you look over the list you will
see that the questions have not always been
related to a large system, they have in fact been
related to exim doing various things such as
filtering, alias file problem etc.

I do not do contract work, in fact I tell a lie I
did once, but not with exim but Cold Fusion, so i
guess i wouldn't post here for that.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the very concept of
mailing lists etc was to 1. notify about problems,
and 2. to see if what u have done has been done by
others, else we may all just re-invent the wheel.

So exactly where does my posting of this question
to the mailing list deviate from this, Also
re-reading myposting I dont think I asked anyone
for a complete system design, just needed
confirmation that what I thought may/or may not
work, just in case someone else had had the same
problem.

I do not live/eat breath exim, I have to work on
everything else from radius authentication to web
servers to modem chassis, MS (&*^ing) exchange,
networks, and even bloody dreamweaver on a MAC, so
forgive me but i only have 24 hrs in a day, and I
cant keep up to date with everything that is new,
and built into exim, hence I have to rely on
people who live/eat and breath exim. I just
thought they could be found on this mailing list,
but obviously i am incorrect in assuming that.

I.

P.S As for my full name, well I have never
attached it to my email address, I like it like
that, and it has always been like that, and will
remain like that, and if you think that is a sign
of a novice so be it.

P.P.S The problem is not actually for a contract,
in fact its not even for a job, it is merely
something I was thinking about, and was curious as
to how people may implement this, cause I thought
I'd figured out the SMTp part, but the pop server
part was bugging me.


Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>
> Iqbal,
>
> me@??? said:
> > I've been asked to design/setup a mail server for large customer base >
> > 500K
>
> I'm getting a little cheesed off. You turn up on the list every couple
> of months with a new ISP or similar contract asking either pretty basic
> questions that are in the documentation or asking that we do complex
> system design for you. Now this list is populated with people who know
> a lot about complex mail system design - and certainly includes a few
> (of the small number in total in the world) who know from real
> experience how to implement mail systems that work in the million user
> class. However I certainly do not intend to start giving pin point
> detail on how to implement this class of service, especially when much
> of the implementation will depend on other details - the type of user
> base, the connectivity, the expected volumes and destinations etc.
>
> There are a number of people who do this sort of thing on the list and
> will be willing to take consultancy contracts to educate you on the
> issues. However I believe you are abusing the good will of the list
> members to continually expect us to provide you with answers which you
> are apparently being paid to produce.
>
> There is a critical point, I guess somewhere of the order of 100K
> users, but it depends on your users and systems, where doing this sort
> of thing gets suddenly *much* harder - at least doing it in a way that
> scales and is reliable. If you aren't aware of the issues affecting
> this, then you probably ought to drop this contract before you get
> burned.
>
> BTW its always a sign of a novice user that the from address has no
> reasonable full name attached.
>
>         Nigel.
> --
> [ Nigel Metheringham                  Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
> [ Phone: +44 1423 850000                         Fax +44 1423 858866 ]