The entity claiming to be Philip Hazel wrote...
> On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Mark Lowes wrote:
>
> > I'm seeing the same thing here
[...]
> That is not the same thing. What was reported was a case of sending the
> message on.
My mistake.
> There is no way to avoid the "accept message, reject later" syndrome,
> unless you can verify all recipient addresses at SMTP time.
Ok, thanks.
Mark
--
This is a sig, it's not a smart sig or an AI sig, but it's a sig to
replace the sig that died during the death of data... the sig is dead,
long live the sig
