Re: [Exim] Semantics of freeze_exec_fail

トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Philip Hazel
日付:  
To: James Fidell
CC: exim-users
題目: Re: [Exim] Semantics of freeze_exec_fail
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, James Fidell wrote:

> Do I need to include 73 and 75 explicitly when I set temp_errors,


Yes.

> or will
> they continue to be treated normally regardless of its setting ?


No.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.