Re: [Exim] Semantics of freeze_exec_fail

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MJames Fidell at <-
M 
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: James Fidell
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Semantics of freeze_exec_fail
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, James Fidell wrote:

> Do I need to include 73 and 75 explicitly when I set temp_errors,

Yes.

> or will
> they continue to be treated normally regardless of its setting ?

No. 

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.





This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Exim] log_file_path[Exim] Not send mail to sender?->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)