RE: [EXIM] exim, majordomo and spam redux

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Bernard Stern
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: RE: [EXIM] exim, majordomo and spam redux

On Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:44:38 +0100 (BST) Philip Hazel wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Richard Welty wrote:


>> From: Bernard Stern [mailto:stern@switch.ch]
>> > Everything works, except the
>> > condition. Then I did the debug_print thing. Interestingly (bud sadly)
>> > received_protocol as well as sender_ident were both empty. I could not
>> > yet find out why both variables are empty.
>>
>> i presume from the lack of followup that nobody has a clue why this is
>> happening.


> I have a clue! (I followed it up privately.) The test I was sent was
> checking an address with -bt. Since no message had been received,
> naturally received_protocol and sender_ident were not set. This should
> not be the case when actually delivering, and for testing, these things
> can be set with -oM... options.


Yes, that was it. Thanks a lot Philip. Now it works also for me. I
should have read the relevant paragraphs in the spec more carefully.

Bernard Stern, SWITCH

--
*** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***