In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9906261608480.14105-100000@???>
> Received: from hal.microwave.com (hal.microwave.com [216.46.200.94])
> by nickel.cix.co.uk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA02759
> for <hedgehog@???>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:09:21
+0100
> (BST)
> X-Envelope-From: djc@???
> Received: from djc (helo=localhost)
> by hal.microwave.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.00 #1)
> id 10xylH-0003gB-00; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:09:15 -0400
> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:09:15 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Microwave Systems Eximlist Exploder <eximlist@???>
> X-Sender: djc@???
> To: Adrian Harris <hedgehog@???>
> cc: exim-users@???
> Subject: Re: [EXIM] Dual identity host.
> In-Reply-To: <memo.243565@???>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9906261608480.14105-100000@???>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Sender: <djc@???>
> Apparently-To: hedgehog@???
>
>
>
> I have to ask - did you restart exim after modifying the config file,
> or send it a HUP?
>
> On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, Adrian Harris wrote:
>
> > I have a mail system which will be running the mail for name1.ac.uk.
> > This connects to JANET via a firewall and (afaict) is set up
> > correctly. It is currently running exim 2.12.
> >
> > We also have a legacy email address, name2.demon.co.uk, which is read
> > by dial-up ISDN, also through a firewall.
> >
> > All users are defined on the mail server and collect their email via
> > POP3, so the server doesn't have to worry about relaying within the
> > organisation. The FQDN for the mail server is mail.name1.ac.uk.
> >
> > The name1 domain transmit/deliver all seems to be fine, and it blocks
> > relaying as expected.
> >
> > Having read the docs, I expected that I could add name2.demon.co.uk
> > to the local_domains list and receive email for that domain as well.
> > This is how the previous sendmail config workled, but of course
> > without any of the relay controls provided by exim. I know I could
> > have upgraded to 8.9.x, but I'd rather have a mail system which
> > doesn't require the bat book to run :-)
> >
> > But when Demon attempt to deliver the email, it is bounced with relay
> > refused (host accept). Both smtp connections are made via firewalls,
> > which accept smtp connections for a particular ip address and then
> > forward these to the correct internal IP address of the mail server.
> > I can only assume that the Demon email is bounced because it is not
> > in the same domain as the mail server. Is this true ?
> >
> > The main part of the configure file consists of:
> >
> > primary_hostname = mail2.name1.ac.uk
> > log_rewrites = yes
> > log_file_path = /var/log/exim_%slog
> > qualify_domain = name1.ac.uk
> > receiver_unqualified_nets = 10.1.0.0/16:10.5.0.0/16
> >
> > *** These are our two main internal nets - actually used as class B's.
> >
> > local_domains = name1.ac.uk : name2.demon.co.uk
> > local_domains_include_host = true
> > hosts_treat_as_local = name2.demon.co.uk
> > never_users = root
> > sender_net_accept_relay = 10.1.0.0/16:10.5.0.0/16
> > relay_domains = *.name1.ac.uk : *.name2.demon.co.uk
> >
> >
> > In the rewrites section, I've added:
> >
> > *@*.name1.ac.uk ${local_part}@???
> >
> > so that the headers appear to come from the domain, not the host.
> > Is this the correct methodology ?
> >
> > TIA :-)
> >
> >
> > --
> > *** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***
> >
> >
>
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
