On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Alexander Koch wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 12:24:47PM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> > Personally, I hate this because when you've made a simple typo in an
> > address, it is much easier to forward the bounce to the correct address
> > and tidy it up by cutting out the error message at the top. If you have
> > to go and extract stuff from an attachement, it's more work. But that's
> > just my preference.
>
> Then you have not used mutt that often.
> In mutt I'm viewing the attachments ('v') on a multi-part bounce and am
> typing 'b'(ounce) on the original message part, this time with a corrected
> address. This is much less hassle and editing than saving the mail, editing
> it and resending and stuff.
>
Then you have not used pine that often.. With a simple text bounce, I
can hit forward, cut off the "Forwarded" lines, and re-enter the new
address. If its a MIME bounce, I have to save it, edit out the parts I
need, and re-read it into a new message.
> As we may be switching our main server to Exim soon, that's a thing I will
> certainly miss. Sendmail does it and it so very smooth to bounce a mail
> that has gone wrong.
>
> I haven't used pine wrt that aspect so I don't know how it's for you.
>
> Alexander
>
>
> --
> *** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***
>
>
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
