Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Otavio Exel wrote:
> > here are the headers present in the received message as shown by
> > mutt;
>
> That does look strange, since Exim should always ensure a valid RFC
> 822 message by adding either To: or Bcc:. Can you look at the message
> in the inbox independently of mutt? Just in case...
they are the same except for some text-wrapping mutt did to fit the big
headers in my screen; of cours the 'original' message has already been
touch by procmail and mutt;
> > Exim version 2.05 #1 built 7-Nov-1998 00:31:06
>
> That is quite an old version now, but I don't recall any changes that
> should have affected this.
that's what the latest stable version of Debian ships with;
the server in question is our soon-to-be main mailserver and I need
'some' more experience in unix/linux/MTA's/exim before I dare compile my
own binaries for a production box :-)
as a newbie I was using this case to learn a bit more but it is wasting
to much of your time; it's probably my fault and adding the "To:" header
myself is def'tly a good idea!
1.0E+38 thanks!
--
Otavio Exel /<\oo/>\ oexel@???
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
