On Mon, 17 May 1999, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 1999, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
>
> > I'll double the data_timeout from the default 5m to 10m. If I need to go
> > higher, I'll set up a special router for that particular host.
>
> For the record, it would have been final_timeout you needed to change,
> not data_timeout.
Thanks for that. I realized that after seeing the later messages.
> Even if you write [a filter to drop '\0'] in C it won't be very
> efficient, as an extra process is involved.
Agreed. I don't want to run a separate process on each message,
especially if
> RFC 821, and the revision thereof that is being worked on both say
>
> The mail data may contain any of the 128 ASCII characters.
>
> so as far as I can tell, nulls are not illegal.
> On Mon, 17 May 1999, Khaled Tabbara wrote:
>
> > We are seeing the same exact symptoms. In some cases, the user on the
> > receiving end is getting multiple (20+) copies of the same message as a
> > result of Exim's retrying.
That is not (as far as I know) been happening at my down stream site.
So we are talking about different situations.
-j
--
Jeffrey Goldberg +44 (0)1234 750 111 x 2826
Cranfield Computer Centre FAX 751 814
J.Goldberg@??? http://WWW.Cranfield.ac.uk/public/cc/cc047/
Relativism is the triumph of authority over truth, convention over justice.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
