On Thu, 13 May 1999, James Fidell wrote:
> Errrm. I am using the "-bS" option and feeding it batch smtp data. I
> thought that meant that the "-oMr" option would work as I was expecting ?
Ooops. Sorry. I wasn't paying enough attention. That *is* a bug, and
very easy to fix, I think, so I will fix it for 3.00 so the code and
documentation agree.
> "-oMr" has some useful semantics for re-introducing virus-scanned messages
> in that it allows a trusted user only to set a flag that can be tested to
> see if the message has been scanned ok. Having a flag that anyone can set
> would possibly be useful, but not necessarily in this context.
I wasn't thinking of a flag anybody could set, just a trusted user.
Noted for the Wish List.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
