On Thu, 14 Jan 1999 11:42:13 +0000 (BST), you wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Marc Haber wrote:
>> This is about what I intend to do. However, I'd like to bounce that
>> message once it is identified.
>
>If you are using "bounce" in the technical sense of "return to sender"
>and you are really dealing with spam, you will find that 99% of the time
>you cannot return anything to the sender because the sender address is
>bogus.
I am well aware of this.
Actually, I intend to bounce the message to postmaster on the
offending system (by means of do.main@???).
If a relay has been raped, the bounce will go to postmaster on the
relay and if spam has been delivered via a dialup, it will go to
postmaster of the ISP. abuse.net is so nice and easy to use :-)
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
