Quoth Pollywog on Wed, Dec 16, 1998:
> Could Exim be tested for Y2K compliance by moving the system clock date up
> to the day before January 1, 2000. I am guessing there is some reason
> this won't work, but I don't know what that reason might be.
I don't think exim will fail under this kind of condition. Also,
what the vendor of our favorite operating system (you won't
holy-war me!) did was setting the clock to the year 2000, and
then incrementing it each time by several months or years and
letting it run for some time.
Vadik.
--
If you think C++ is not overly complicated, just what is a protected
abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor, and when
was the last time you needed one?
-- Tom Cargil, C++ Journal.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
