Re: [EXIM] "full virtualization"?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Lutz Pressler
Date:  
To: Philip Hazel
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [EXIM] "full virtualization"?
On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Philip Hazel wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Lutz Pressler wrote:
>
> > Now I don't think I understand.. I don't find any sender_host_address
> > entries in *-H files here, only host_adress - and that is the remote

                                           ^d    

> > address. What I would need is the connect local address.

                                             ^ed

>
> Oh, sorry. My mistake. It's Monday morning, and I spent all of yesterday
> until 12:30 a.m. working in the theatre, so I'm not quite my usual
> bright and alert self this morning... :-)

No problem.. not SO different with me :) (look at the spelling errors..)
>
> I meant to say host_address - that is, the remote address. I now
> understand what you want. You want to save the local interface address
> that was used to receive the message. Something like $interface_address.
> That would be relatively straightforward to set up, I think.

Thant's nice to hear.
>
> I have put all of this onto the New Wish List. It is too late for the 2.10
> release which I am trying to pull together now, however.

Sure.

Thanks,
Lutz

--
  _              |  Lutz Pressler          |  Tel: ++49-551-3700002
 |_     |\ |     |  Service Network GmbH   |  FAX: ++49-551-3700009
 ._|ER  | \|ET   |  Hannah-Vogt-Strasse 1  |   mailto:lp@SerNet.DE
Service Network  |  D-37085 Goettingen     |  http://www.SerNet.DE/



--
*** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***