Re: [EXIM] "full virtualization"?

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Philip Hazel
Date:  
À: Lutz Pressler
CC: exim-users
Nouveaux-sujets: NewWishLis (Re: [EXIM] "full virtualization"?)
Sujet: Re: [EXIM] "full virtualization"?
On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Lutz Pressler wrote:

> Now I don't think I understand.. I don't find any sender_host_address
> entries in *-H files here, only host_adress - and that is the remote
> address. What I would need is the connect local address.


Oh, sorry. My mistake. It's Monday morning, and I spent all of yesterday
until 12:30 a.m. working in the theatre, so I'm not quite my usual
bright and alert self this morning... :-)

I meant to say host_address - that is, the remote address. I now
understand what you want. You want to save the local interface address
that was used to receive the message. Something like $interface_address.
That would be relatively straightforward to set up, I think.

I have put all of this onto the New Wish List. It is too late for the 2.10
release which I am trying to pull together now, however.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.



--
*** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***