On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Tabor J. Wells wrote:
> YM, receiver_verify? Yes that does seem to do the job. Thanks. :)
Yes, sorry. My brain confuses "receiver" and "recipient" all the time.
(Not to mention lots of other things :-)
> Well it'd be nice if the 550 returned the custom message after the :fail:
> instead of a generic "Unknown local part". Ditto the defer.
It is supposed to do that, from version 2.03 onwards.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
