On Thu, 24 Sep 1998 patl@??? wrote:
> I haven't read the RFCs; but it seems like it would be possible to
> add a generic transport boolean that would indicate that this transport
> is expected or believed to constitute the final delivery. The default
> should probably be 'false'; but it could be argued that delivery to a
> file should default to 'true'. (Or am I misunderstanding the scope of
> the problem?)
Yes, that is the only solution I can see for final delivery. However, I
can see no such tidy way of handling forwarding and aliasing operations.
> occasionally deny ever having received a message. MDNs would help
> my peace of mind when dealing with these folks.
I'm happy to leave MDNs to the MUAs.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
