On Tue, 8 Sep 1998, Matthew Adams wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Sep 1998, at 09:46:53 +0100
> Philip Hazel <ph10@???> wrote:
> >
> > Oh dear. That isn't a failure of sender_verify; it is a failure of
> > headers_sender_verify. Unfortunately, there is a present no way of
> > setting up any exceptions to it.
>
> Oh, my interpretation of spec.txt for headers_sender_verify was that
> sender_verify_except_hosts was used to give exceptions?
You are correct, and there is a possible problem here. I've read the
manual, and it does say so explicitly. Sorry about that. I seem to be
having a bad day today... I have now read the code more carefully, and
spotted something that I missed. The code also appears to attempt to
behave as the manual says. Are you using Exim 2.02? (I forget if you
said, sorry.) If you are, then I will try to reproduce your problem and
fix it.
> I'll turn off headers_sender_verify for now as I don't have a "cunning
> plan" just at the moment, but I'll look at that for the future.
You may not need to...
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
