On Fri, Sep 04, 1998, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, Peter Radcliffe wrote:
> > I'm not _too_ bothered (I only put the procmail check there out of
> > healthy paranoia after seeing sendmail set up to use procmail as a local
> > transport barf badly on machines that accidentally had no procmail), but
> > I can see a need for :x/program/to/run:
>
> Added an item to the wish list, but what does x actually mean?
> Executable by who? Easier to implement a test for specific permission
> bits.
Something like POSIX access(2) should be suitable.
Vadik.
--
It was state of the art, he said.
The art in this case was probably pottery.
-- Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, "Good Omens"
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
