Philip Hazel <ph10@???> writes:
> The DRUMS discussion rambled on to no general conclusion, but I think it
> was clear to all that Reply-To is fatally flawed, and the suggestion was
> made that some new headers were needed to specify more clearly what the
> author wants to suggest in connection with replies. I forget the details
> (I wasn't paying much attention). I expect there will be some action in
> this area, but please don't start the discussion again on this list!
DJB came up with a "Mail-Followup-To" header which is adhered to by
mutt and nmh amongst others. Docs are on his web site somewhere
(<URL:
http://www.pobox.com/~djb/>).
--
``Quick, beam that cheese to sickbay!'' -- BT
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
