Philip Hazel <ph10@???> probably said:
> On Thu 03 Sep, Peter Radcliffe wrote:
> > don't try). Hrrrm, does this mean the pipe would fail if it was readable
> > and not executable ?
> I guess so, but I don't really want to have to implement a complete file
> testing set of operators like -f, -z etc. inside Exim.
I can understand the desire for no more code bloat than needed, but
when you want to test if something can be used by a pipe, you want to see
if that user can execute it. I can't see a need for any of the others.
I'm not _too_ bothered (I only put the procmail check there out of
healthy paranoia after seeing sendmail set up to use procmail as a local
transport barf badly on machines that accidentally had no procmail), but
I can see a need for :x/program/to/run:
$0.02
P.
--
pir pir@??? pir@??? pir@???
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
