> The RFC says that Bcc: shouldn't be passed on to primary recipients.
> If exim passes it on (as it does) then it isn't following the RFC.
exim has no concept of a "primary recipient" *UNLESS* it has been given the
"-t" HACK to tell it to generate the recipients.
If it is working as a true MTA, it cannot correlate actual recipients with RFC
822 headers.
> It should assume that if there is a Bcc: header then the client wants
> it to go out
As it does.
> but it should only go out to the people in the Bcc: header, not everyone.
As above -- a true MTA cannot determine which recipients are Bcc: recipients
and which are not.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
