On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Alan Thew wrote:
> FWIW, the latest mutt and exim (on RH 4.2) do the "right thing" with bcc
I lied... the copy that exim sent to another machine lost the bcc but
a local copy did not, I only have mutt on machines with exim so cannot
compare....
> .
>
> --
> Alan Thew alan.thew@???
> Computing Services,University of Liverpool Fax: +44 151 794-4442
>
> On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Dave Holland wrote:
>
> >I wrote:
> >>I've done a few experiments to try to find out what's causing this:
> >
> >But the mail gateway (not exim) mangled the next bit. It should have read:
> >
> >dahol@lt02:~$ mailx dave.holland@???
> >Subject: another test
> >foo
> >~b dave@???
> >.
> >Cc:
> >dahol@lt02:~$
> >
> >...leaves the Bcc: line intact on delivery.
> >
> >dahol@lt02:~$ /usr/sbin/exim -t
> >From: dave.holland@???
> >To: dave.holland@???
> >Bcc: dave.holland@???
> >Subject: a test
> >check the Bcc: line
> >.
> >dahol@lt02:~$
> >
> >...drops the Bcc: line (as it should).
> >
> >(Using exim 2.02 (Debian v1), Debian Linux, problem also seen
> >with exim 1.92, and in conjunction with the "mutt" mailer.)
> >
> >Thanks again,
> >
> >Dave (hoping that *this* version gets out OK)
> >
> >
> >--
> >Dave Holland -=- Systems Administrator -=- Hexagen Technology, UK
> > -=- phone: (+44)(0)1223 424877 -=- fax: (+44)(0)1223 424855 -=-
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >*** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***
> >
>
>
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
