patl@??? said:
} Exim supports the later two, because they don't require any explicit
} action from the MTA. Supporting Return-Receipt-To: is something of a
} religious issue. If support is added to Exim; it should be
} configurable, and OFF by default. Actually, I'd want three possible
} settings: OFF, ON, and 'only when the envelope expands to a single
} recipient.'. And even then, I'd still keep the headers_remove that
} prunes it out before it can reach a majordomo list.
You should be able to support Return-Receipt-To: using a combination of an
exim filter and a specialised transport (probably a specially configured
autoreply transport).
Alternatively, masochists could do the whole lot within a transport filter
or shadow transport.
I would strongly protest adding any explicit support for a badly thought
out and officially depreciated feature in exim - even sendmail doesn't
support Return-Receipt-To: now.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel.Metheringham@??? - Systems Software Engineer ]
[ Tel : +44 113 207 6112 Fax : +44 113 234 6065 ]
[ Real life is but a pale imitation of a Dilbert strip ]
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
