Re: [EXIM] pipe transport: feature request

Inizio della pagina
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autore: Philip Hazel
Data:  
To: Ben Smithurst
CC: exim-users
Oggetto: Re: [EXIM] pipe transport: feature request
On Mon, 13 Jul 1998, I wrote:

> 69 is EX_UNAVAILABLE, and there was a previous suggestion that it should
> cause deferment. Release 2.00 of Exim has the ability to recognize a
> list of return codes that cause deferment, and the default list now
> contains both 75 and 69.


That is rubbish. The two default values in the list are 75 and 73
(EX_CANTCREAT). EX_UNAVAILABLE is used internally by Exim to signal
execve() failure.

-- 
Philip Hazel                   University Computing Service,
P.Hazel@???          New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
ph10@??? (sic)       England.  Phone: +44 1223 334714



--
*** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***