On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Bruce Bowler wrote:
> At 02:28 PM 4/27/98 +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> >One wonders why the default is to be invalid. Sigh.
>
> I've not looked at 1.90 yet (too much other stuff to do) but based on your
> comments, it seems that the default behaviour of 1.90 is to "allow
> invalid".
Touche. However, "accepting invalid" isn't quite the same as "generating
invalid".
--
Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
ph10@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@??? England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
