> woods@??? said:
> } Since Exim's list handler is currently polluting the messages posted
> } to it in several ways (eg. the horrid "[EXIM]" in the subject, and the
> } only slightly less horrid pseudo-signature on the tail),
"Horrid"? I think its Great.
With the "[EXIM]" marker, I can scan my incoming box, often 50-60
messages deep, and locate more critical email before taking the plunge
to read the extremely verbose set of [EXIM] messages.
(Since the EXIM incoming email is vast these days, I have even thought
about filtering all EXIM email into a digest that I can zip through
once a week ... The [EXIM] marker would make this task easy ...)
---
Nigel.Metheringham@??? said:
> I guess that unless and until someone else takes over the list, you'll
> have to live with my prejudices.... although I am open to argument in
> general.
I think we all owe Nigel a very loud THANK YOU for taking the time
to host/maintain
www.exim.org, run this list, and for dealing with
us in general. What kind of salary are we paying you again, Nigel?
We really do owe Nigel, and Phil, big time.
-cc
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
