Sorry to reply to my own message but I thought I could clarify something here.
It is not important that any mailer that I use understand !path routing, all of
the uucp sites that I pass mail to understand internet style addresses. What IS
important is the pathalias style table.
With smail, I have modified the uux transport to create a uux-dom transport by
changing uucp to inet in the transport description.
I have also created a router and transport in exim that looks an address up in
a domain table and hands it off to smail if the mail is destined to a uucp
domain.
I am currently trying to build a list of domain=transport lists with exim so I
can use a domainized uucp transport to some domains and a batched smtp
transport to others based on what I find in the table. I think I would use
a lookup to do that but I am still figuring out the syntax.
On 01-Nov-97 George Bonser wrote:
>
> On 01-Nov-97 Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>>
>> I don't understand Greg's point of "slightly different user bases". Are
>> they different in their needs, or merely their makeup? What are their
>> separate requirements, such that a pooling of talent between smail and
>> exim could not give them what they need?
>
> Well, try to get exim to read a pathalias routing table and spool the mail
> using a demand_inet_uusmtp transport. Or, try to get exim to understand mail
> with !path headers.
>
>
>
> --
> * This is sent by the exim-users mailing list. To unsubscribe send a
> mail with subject "unsubscribe" to exim-users-request@???
> * Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/
>
--
* This is sent by the exim-users mailing list. To unsubscribe send a
mail with subject "unsubscribe" to exim-users-request@???
* Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/
