On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Georg v.Zezschwitz wrote:
> it seems to be known from the source code that exim sometimes
> causes segmentation faults in the db-library (that are caught
> by signal handlers in more recent versions).
>
> I don't know if anybody is keen on some dumps, but we have some
> of these segmentation-faults:
Yes, I'm interested to know the code is catching them. I wish I knew how
the DB 1.85 databases get corrupted, which usually leads to this.
> LOG: 0 MAIN PANIC
> SEGV while reading "" from dbm file: record assumed not to exist
I don't think it should be looking for a null string, though. I will see
if I can track what is going on when I get a moment.
Meanwhile, you might like to try running exim_dumpdb on your retry
database and see if it manages to read it all without complaint.
Thanks for the report.
Philip
--
Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
ph10@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@??? England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
--
* This is sent by the exim-users mailing list. To unsubscribe send a
mail with subject "unsubscribe" to exim-users-request@???
* Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/