Re: Locking and concurrency -- system considerations

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Jon Morby
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: Locking and concurrency -- system considerations
On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Jon Morby wrote:

> > if 4 digits were used for the pid (allowing up to 14776335 for the pid)
> > that would still leave two digits for the machine id - 3843 possible
> > values. Modifying Exim to generate message ids in this way would not be
> > a big task.
>
> Could be the answer .... It would certainly be useful to have multiple
> machines writing to one area (from my viewpoint anyway)


I've made a note on my Exim Wish List, as I don't think this is a
difficult modification (with a spec of "some_option = number", though
you could look up the number based on the primary hostname, of course).

> No, I concur completely .... But then I haven't said that I'm not prepared to
> pay something for the solution I end up using. :)


You aren't suggesting ... ? No, I'm dreaming ... :-))

Philip

-- 
Philip Hazel                   University Computing Service,
ph10@???             New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@???          England.  Phone: +44 1223 334714



--
* This is sent by the exim-users mailing list.  To unsubscribe send a
    mail with subject "unsubscribe" to exim-users-request@???
* Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/