On Sat, 20 Sep 1997, Dr. Rich Artym wrote:
> If obscure "reject on matching arbitrary bitfield" functionality is
> desired then it shouldn't be provided under the title of an otherwise
> clear and unambiguous "reject on matching network" option, IMO. So few
> people "think binary" that that just leads to confusion and mistakes.
> It would be safer to stick to textbook netmasks and netwidths in Exim,
> I think.
Seems like there is some support for this. I will cause Exim to complain
if the netmask doesn't consist of a sequence of 1's followed by a
sequence of 0's.
--
Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
ph10@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@??? England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
--
* This is sent by the exim-users mailing list. To unsubscribe send a
mail with subject "unsubscribe" to exim-users-request@???
* Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/
