djb@??? said:
} sender_net_accept_relay = "204.249.49.0/204.249.50.0"
^^^^^^^^^^^^
This part should be a netmask - I'd say that *should* be a syntax error,
and almost certainly doesn't mean what you think.
[Philip - if this is accepted can the code be tightened to reject it]
djb@??? said:
} I've already ruled out the spam_domains and spam_networks lists as
} being to blame, so I'm guessing that one of two things is happening.
If you have produced network lines in your spam_networks in the form used
above then I would expect very strange things to happen. I think this
really might be where your problem lies.
The networks entries are a set of colon separated entries. Each entry
consists of either (ignoring IPV6 stuff):-
<IP Address>
<Network/IP Address> / <dotted quad network mask>
<Network/IP Address> / <integer network width>
A dotted quad network mask should look like this
255.255.255.0
If you converted to binary then all the 1's should be at the top end, all
the zeros at the low end, never a mixture of ones and zeroes.
The integer network width is an int from 0 to 32 inclusive. The netmask
give above equates to a width of 24.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel.Metheringham@??? - Systems Software Engineer ]
[ Tel : +44 113 251 6012 Fax : +44 113 224 0003 ]
[ Friends don't let friends use sendmail! ]
--
* This is sent by the exim-users mailing list. To unsubscribe send a
mail with subject "unsubscribe" to exim-users-request@???
* Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/
