Re: New filtering rules in Exim 1.651-for-testing release

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: John Henders
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: New filtering rules in Exim 1.651-for-testing release

It's documented in the NewStuff file in 1.651. I haven't tried 653 yet.
I now use the following.

sender_reject_recipients = @@partial0-lsearch;/etc/exim/rejects
sender_host_reject = @@partial0-lsearch;/etc/exim/rejects


rejects contains lines like the following.

*: ^\d{8}$
aol.com: ^[0-9]+$
1-500-fingers.com:      *
1stamend.com:   *
2020nuvision.com:       *
mci2000.com: lightning500 : >*
hotmail.com: rd_enterprise : >*



On Fri, Aug 08/97, William Craven <William.Craven@???> wrote:
> John Henders wrote:
> >
> > I think Philip is away, but is anyone else using the new filter rules
> > and @@lsearch;/some/file lookup? My reading of the newstuff file is
> > that the following should reject an 8 digit username from any site.
> >
> > *: ^\d{8}$
> >
> > Sadly, this doesn't appear to be the case. Is it broken, or am I
> > misreading that section of the NewStuff file.
>
> I am looking into DB lookup for filter rules and from this mailing list
> I discovered it was possible in version 1.61 using tortuous string
> expansions. However I if I understand John's message correctly a
> simplified method is available on the testing versions. I have
> downloaded version 1.653 and cannot see any mention on the use of @@ in
> filter rules. Am I looking in the wrong place ?
>
> Wm.
> -- 
> William Craven                Email:  William.Craven@???
> University Computing Services        Tel:    +1-604-822-8955
> University of British Columbia        FAX:    +1-604-822-5116
> Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2


-- 
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*